White v. ARCO/Polymers, Inc.
720 F.2d 1391 (5th Cir. 1983)
CCH      
How Cited        Cited By:      ...

Wong v. City & County of Honolulu
333 F.Supp. 2d 942, 951 (D. Haw. 2004)
CHH    |      
How Cited:       Cited By:   |      ...
American Title Ins., Co. v. Lacelaw Corp.
861 F.2d 224, 227 (9th Cir. 1988)
CCH      How Cited:            Cited By:      ACE
Booker v. The City of St. Paul
762 F.3d 730 (8th Cir. 2014)
CHH       
How Cited       Cited By         ...
HOME

Sandia v. Rivera
46 P. 3d 108, 132 (N.Mex 2002)
CCH      How Cited:            Cited By:      ACE

Goichman v. City of Aspen
859 F.2d 1466 (10th Cir. 1988)

How Cited
xxxx (9th Cir. xxx)

CCH      How Cited:            Cited By:      ACE
     Answering Brief     

xxxx (9th Cir. xxx)
CCH      How Cited:            Cited By:      ACE

xxxx (9th Cir. xxx)

CCH      How Cited:            Cited By:      ACE

xxxx (9th Cir. xxx)

CCH      How Cited:            Cited By:      ACE

xxxx (9th Cir. xxx)

CCH      How Cited:            Cited By:      ACE
Independent Towers, WA v. Washington
350 F. 3d 925 (9th Cir. 2003)
How Cited:            Cited By:
Crull v. GEM
58 F.3d 1386, 1391 (9th Cir. 1995)
     How Cited:            Cited By:      
                       Conley v. Gibson
                   355 US 41, 47 (1957)
Defendant CCH has failed to identify how they were
prejudiced since their Answering Brief at Part IV. A &
B argued the issued and Defendant ACE did not
raise the issue.  
               How Cited:            Cited By:    
                    Mamouzian v. Ashcroft
             390 F. 3d 1129 fn 4 (9th Cir 2004)
[4]
Even if Mamouzian had not sufficiently raised the
claim of future persecution, we retain discretion to
decide the merits of her claim "`because the
government briefed it, and thus suffers no prejudice
from [the petitioner's] failure to properly raise the
issue.'"
Ndom, 384 F.3d at 751 (quoting Singh v.
Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1152, 1157 n. 3 (9th Cir.2004)).
Furthermore, we may review an issue not presented
in an opening brief if a failure to do so would result in
a manifest injustice.
Koerne v. Grigas, 328 F.3d
1039, 1048-49 (9th Cir.2003).
Koerner v. Grigas
328 F.3d 1039, 1048 (9th Cir. 2003)
How Cited:            Cited By:
Desert Outdoor Advertising v. City of Oakland
506 F. 3d 798 (9th Cir 2007)
How Cited:          Cited By:

Sandia v. Rivera
46 P. 3d 108 (NM Ct Appeals 2002)
(impound statute facially unconstitutional
re no post tow due process hearing)
How Cited:            Cited By:
ACE - - Answering Brief
Plaintiff
American Title Ins., Co. v. Lacelaw Corp.
861 F.2d 224, 227 (9th Cir. 1988)
How Cited:           Cited By:
Opening Brief
REPLY Brief
CCH
ACE